That rather graphic title should probably include “or financial gain” to cover all the motives. But that would have made for too long a title. Honestly it is difficult to fathom how after the horrors of the Columbine High murders in 1999, which actually started as a desired bomb plot to blow up the school, anyone involved with Transformational Outcomes Based Education would not have begged for forgiveness. OK, that’s not realistic in our litigious day and age. No one would want to acknowledge their pushed SEL practices might have had a role in initiating the tragedy.
But at least we could have hoped for a Cease and Desist from continuing to actively cultivate the emotions and trying to alter the student’s consciousness. Why continue the practices Columbine was already notorious for before that tragic April day? In an effort to profitably create a Consciousness for Revolution as we discussed in the previous post, some of these manipulated students, usually bright boys, seem to be getting stuck in the cultivated horror and fracturing into the evil school officials and education professors unwisely pushed on students. We will never know the actual causes but we have too much correlation with SEL not to be careful in continuing these deliberate pushes for psychological and emotional transformation in students.
I do not want to linger on such tragedies. But the memories of these SEL connections seem to be fading enough that the manipulative practices are coming back into classrooms and common practice. As part of the implementation of Common Core just like they were part of the 1990s push for comparable radical transformation. And in a substantial percentage of cases with these horrific school shootings where the place seems to be part of the rage, we find an active policy of pushing SEL and an affective orientation and changing fundamental values, attitudes, feelings, and beliefs as a core function of the targeted school.
Since the typical reader of this post will not be in a position to recognize the names associated with the creation of the Transformational OBE political and social change theory, know the various euphemisms associated with OBE core practices, or be able to put back together the Transformational OBE template even when all has been renamed and broken into parts, I am going to have to share a personal story. I am not doing it to try to get anyone in trouble or point fingers of deliberate intent or malevolent neglect or even negligent disregard of crucial facts from the past. I honestly believe people never knew or have forgotten the links. And we still need that Cease and Desist.
That all these tragic practices are now being pushed again all over the world may be because it is what the accreditation agencies want or because it is now the road to a lucrative next promotion or because it seems superficially like a noble, utopian refocus for the schools to help all students. It is certainly what UNESCO wants as part of its Education for All transformation of the West. Perhaps there is a naive sense that this time there will be no further tragedies because the motives for good results are deemed pure. Whether it is called Student Wellbeing as in Australia now or the Positive Behavior and School Climate now in Canada and the US, it has the same common genesis in the pre-Columbine Transformational OBE when motives were openly discussed and the emotional elements at the core were the feature to be touted. Euphemisms were not yet necessary. That’s where we need to go back to.
My story was generated by an IB High School in Fulton County Georgia informing the parents that some of the faculty had been sent for summer training in Colorado called “Performance Excellence for All Kids (PEAK).” The Principal who had come from Charlotte-Mecklenberg the previous year had brought PEAK with him. He sent out a letter wanting to raise $120,000 for the training this year for all the school’s teachers. On the first day of orientation this past week, he eagerly announced the redirection of everyone in the high school towards the IB Learner (Change the Student) Profile, http://www.amersol.edu.pe/fdr/curriculum/strategic_planning/IB_Learner_Profile.asp is a link to the 10 Attributes if you have never seen it, and the Relationships, Rigor, and Relevance push I have already written.http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/rigor-relevance-and-relationships-the-new-3rs-to-get-to-a-caring-economics/
Oh, and instead of PBIS as in Positive Behavior Intervention System, the high school will now have a Positive Behavior Incentive Program with an everyday emphasis on whether students are demonstrating the 5 Desired “P’s.” Polite and Punctual were two mentioned before I dazed into Oh. No. Not Again shock. First no content and now this? http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/you-mean-i-cant-teach-because-the-economy-should-not-grow/
Fellow Parents at the high school presentation would have heard the word “success” almost as often as the word “engage” but are unlikely to know that in the 90s William Spady and Spence Rogers called their Transformational OBE push for schools the High Success Network. Here’s a 1994 discussion from the insider industry publication Educational Leadership explaining the different Levels of OBE and the goals of the High Success Network. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar94/vol51/num06/Choosing-Outcomes-of-Significance.aspx
Careful readers will notice the 10 Life Performance Roles described for Transformational OBE basically dovetail with the 10 from the IB Learner Profile. That’s how breaking up, renaming, and finding a new more palatable vehicle works. I think that is the UNESCO influence showing. I can also look at an Australian middle school that adopted the Coalition for Essential Schools template and the ATLAS-Authentic Learning for All Students-template that came out of US reforms in the 90s and their rhetoric and programs also dovetail with that IB Learner Profile. Probably the Benjamin Bloom influence on the models UNESCO has pushed all over the world since the early 70s from the Summer Institutes he did for them.
PEAK’s “Teaching for Excellence” model says explicitly it is grounded in what was previously called OBE. It also proclaims its incorporation of Mastery Learning, Bloom’s baby. For those of you keeping track, Bloom was a student and close friend of Ralph Tyler who created OBE in the 30s to obscure the real transformative, anti-academic aims of the Progressive Education Association’s Eight Year Study. I explained that here http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/is-common-core-a-catalyst-to-dramatically-alter-system/ and here http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/if-standardsoutcomesobjectives-what-is-the-real-common-core/
The links are necessary to fully appreciate just how closely tied in all these ideas and people are and why they keep recurring. Plus the teachers have enjoyed their summer and are now back to deal with the troubling implications of the real Common Core paradigm. They need this information and so do the parents, like me, who are being forced to put children into schools using practices with such a tragic past and a political aim to gut this country’s current economic system. Plus a deliberate targeting of our political system grounded in the importance and primacy of the individual.
Both aims are being sought by using the schools to remake the child’s personality and filtering mindset. I have little doubt this template is being replicated elsewhere in the Fulton County district and in Charlotte where PEAK came from and in school districts all over the US. Since you are unlikely to know where to look to figure out what is going on, here’s Spence Rogers’ published definition of the SEL dynamic behind “Relationship-Driven Teaching”:
“Fostering positive feelings as a motivational strategy in the classroom requires creating a learning context that enables students to value the activities enough to want to learn and to achieve. Learning occurs only when what is being presented is meaningful enough to the student that he or she decides to actively engage in the learning experience. People often judge an activity as meaningful when it satisfies deep-rooted human emotional needs. When those needs are met in the classroom, students want to learn and to achieve to the highest standards.”
The very idea that the teacher who cannot teach a Chemistry course grounded in knowledge is now going to engage students at a deep emotional level is both atrocious and absurd. This is also manifestly the Marxist theory of the Mind where only physical activity and social interaction count or are wanted. No private, personal thinking allowed. Especially the logical, abstract, Axemaker Mind kind. Now there is hopefully no way either this pushing principal or his boss, Robert Avossa, who also came from Charlotte, have any idea of the tragic history of Transformational OBE or its nefarious purposes. Although I am greatly concerned with what Avossa meant when he told the Broad Superintendents Academy in 2011 that he wanted a “level playing field in American education.” That is not the spiel he gives parents and taxpayers back home.
This was long with links because this matters. This is a totalitarian template that is to go into operation to attack students’ minds and unconscious emotions to try to change behaviors starting this Monday, August 13. If all these facts are not sufficient to get the super, his central office staff, and the just-following-orders principal to change their minds and back off, well at least the now well-informed parents and taxpayers will know how to treat them. Like you would any adult wanting to live off your tax money while risking bloody outcomes in order to foment a political transformation of this magnificent country that they apparently do not appreciate.
Let’s teach them better values and attitudes and beliefs. We have Gypsy Principals and Supers everywhere now in the US. These two are just the symbols of a very full ship of Change Agents. Perhaps the ship could take a field trip to Cuba to have a hands-on learning experience with the full template being pushed for profit.
Pingback: Emotion Driven Learning: Social Engineering of Standardized Education - Dawn Kazmierzak
The IB learner profile link, no longer working. If you have a copy of it would you be willing to email it ? I’ll keep searching but seems like it’s gone missing these days.
http://www.ibo.org/myib/digitaltoolkit/files/pdfs/learner-profile-en.pdf seems to be the current version.
I also have a hard copy of the history of the MYP that I cite in the book.
There is also this. Note the reference to going beyond Learning to Becoming. http://www.iblearnerprofile.com/ That is straight out of Maslow/Rogers 1962 Humanist Psychology book and all the developmental psych work.
Send this article everywhere. It is relevant to the school shootings. Also makes me want to pull my child out of all forms of public education. Charters are no different. A flagship charter to carry the image of the company and most just want passing standardized test scores, getting by on outward appearance while providing the least quality education possible in less desirable communities.
Please be aware as well that the parochial schools are also using this Excellence, change the child at the level of the mind and personality, template. It permeates the new Catholic Curriculum Frameworks and the Pioneer Institute has called for that framework to also be used in Jewish schools.
When I warned about the significance of the motto of the PROMISE Program in Broward County after the Parkland shooting http://invisibleserfscollar.com/change-your-belief-change-your-behavior-change-your-life-tranzi-obe-again-at-the-forefront/ the same deceivers whose narratives I probed in my most recent post mined my work ithout attribution to make themselves seem authoritative, but refused to once again deal with the ubiquite of Tranzi OBE.
I think the reason is all sides want education to be creating reliable systems that will act in ways that are “context-breaking” instead of “context-preserving”. A transmissive knowledge function of school would be context-preserving and the point is to use ed to create people who want to act on the social fabric of existing society and believe it is necessary. Stealthily creating future revolutionaries though has a considerable chance of causing some of them to connect school as the place of psychological manipulation for ends not their own.
As always the way out is to discuss accurately what is really common to all these horrific attempts to make schools the location of mass murder against fellow students and teachers. Littleton, where Columbine is located, had been piloting the General Evolution Research Group’s Achieving Excellence template. UNESCO now is planning to use the work of GERG member and the original envisioner of charters, Bela Banathy’s work on “Designing Social Systems.” It appears tied to UNESCO attempting to use transformative education to create a Discipline of Anticipation that will use Disciplinary Core Ideas that have been carefully prescribed and annually assessed under federal law to help students practice imagining a different kind of future.
It also fits with the Beloved Community emphasis heard Saturday in the episcopla bishop’s sermon at the Prince Harry/ Markle wedding. I had heard that before at ed programs, but did not know until I recognized what I was hearing that the Episcopal Church had initiated a formal reimagining of their mission on the basis of Martin Luther King’s vision of the Beloved Community. Beloved Community, by the way, has a tag on this blog if anyone wants to catch up on that concept during this rainy week.
https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-05-29-how-ar-and-vr-are-being-used-to-teach-sel goes directly to your point and fits with what the founder of the Institute of Noetic Sciences, Willis Harman recognized in his book from the late 80s Global Mind Change. Experiencing something in virtual reality affects physiology as much as if the experience happened in the existing real world. Experiences can be highly manipulative in order to engineer the desired biological or neural changes.